-
Website
http://www.progressive.org -
Original page
http://www.progressive.org/mag/wx070208 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
cfoss
7 comments · 1 points
-
Rufus_O
6 comments · 19 points
-
Francis
5 comments · 13 points
-
Travisprob
5 comments · 3 points
-
xen
5 comments · 24 points
-
-
Popular Threads
You have the right to speak the way you do because BETTER men than you laid down their lives in defense of the freedoms you take advantage of. Please sir, show up one day where you and I share space and say anything like you write.
of you on the left baffles me, everyone Demorat, Republidiot was all for
Iraq at the start, but it got tough and the first thing you faux
intellectuals do is advocate withdraw... We broke it, the responsible thing
is for us to fix it. OH but to expect you liberals to know anything about
respnsibility is asking too much.
I am proud of the country I live in and you are a so-called inteligent
educated person yet you spit in the face of the very country that aided you
in achieving your intelect. You are a bright person I can tell by your
writing and eventually you will grow up and see that things are not always
worth running from, you need to stand fight and be prepared to make a
sacrifice for others.
While you and your college ilk are screaming "unjust" and "Blood for Oil"
our guys are dying too, and YOU are as guilty in putting them there as I
am. We as a nation put them there, YOU as a liberal piece of crap decide
you would rather make them leave than try to fix the error.. typicl liberal
thinking "Its too hard, we have to quit" Deal with it. We need to fix what
we broke, and true American values need to kick in but unfortunately you
were probaly one of those elite kids that had rich parents and they didn't
love you enough or allowed you to run amuk without some moral values. OH
well I'm just damn glad you ARE the minority, you will see even your Messiah
Obama will not live up to his promise of retreat and surrender....
Wow, you are cool.
When wars come they come to take away civil liberties. Presently the liberties of each and every American are under assault. The Bush Administration is leading the charge against our civil liberties.
So wrap yourself in the butcher's apron and sing the anthem, while Matt and others do the heavy lifting daily their entire lives.
Who has given us freedom of the press.
It is the soldier, not the poet
Who has given us freedom of speech.
It is the soldier, not the campus organizer
Who has given us the freedom to demonstrate.
It is the soldier, not the lawyer
Who has given us the right to a fair trial.
It is the soldier
Who salutes the flag
Who serves under the flag
Whose coffin is draped in the flag
Who allows the protester to burn the flag
-Charles M. Province
Believe what you like, but reality is quite different.
You are correct that wars do infringe upon civil liberties. Liberty and security share a precarious relationship, and an increased need for security always affects civil liberties. You are also correct that governments tend to overstep their boundaries in this process.
What you and Matt are failing to realize is the horrible situation that ensues when governments do nothing in the face of security threats. Your civil liberties, the ones that you and Matt so freely exercise, disappear. Do you think that a resource-rich nation like the United States could maintain its freedoms if patriotism did not lead men and women to defend it militarily? In other words, let's assume that the military was non-existent, but that we were full of 'Matt's' who stood up with their lab-tops and wrote scathing indictments against Islamists, Fascist, Communists or any other state-backed ideology that would love to exploit our resources.
Patriotism does not require throwing the first punch, but it requires the ability to punch-back. Something that Matt does not do.
Matt, I believe has the strength to do right. Certainly he can be harangued for this, which only verifies his worth to us all.
Stop being so afraid to the world and other peoples; have some compassion for the least of us. Enfranchise people
"Join in the battle
Wherein no man can fail
For who so fadeth and dieth
Yet his deed shall still prevail"
William Morris
Yes, of course if someone disagrees with your point of view they must be "ranting, hate-filled...conservatives". See how easy it is, you don't need to debate their points, just launch ad hominiem attacks.
There is a virulent strain of American exceptionalism that infects "progressives" such as the writer of this essay. All countries are given a free pass for genuine human rights violations except for America being charged on dubious evidence.
Seeing economic justice through the prism of statistics filters out the obvious. People own wealth, not numbers, and individuals move up and down through the percentiles quite freely. And the percentiles represent shares of a fluid and growing economy. Ten percent of a trillion is far larger than ten percent of a milliion. The chief nutritional crisis among America's poor is obesity.
The Bush administration has afforded prisoners captured on the battlefield far more legal latitiude than any administration in history. Its efforts to gather intelligence against real enemies has been less intrusive than that employed by progressive icons like FDR and Woodrow Wilson. But then Wilson locked up more disseidents than Mussolini.
We are not less great today, in spite of the economic and historical ignorance of writers like this essayist.
If you think about it, there are a bunch of things that we can brag about. How about our freedoms (eg. of the press), opportunity--a woman and a black man bona fide candidates for President of the United States, speaking of progress. How about our economic opportunities? Natural beauty and abundant resources in the U.S.?
Patriotism is not about nationalism or thinking we are the best. In fact, I think Beinhart in Time Mag did make a useful distinction between loving our country because it is our country and loving our country because of the possibilities. In Beinhart's opinion, the country needs both, and I won't disagree.
I choose to be thankful for the many benefits of living in the United States, but seek to improve it in whatever humble way I can. Personally, I think that three major issues facing the U.S. are serious campaign finance reform to restore real democracy in America; taking care of our own house before we try to fix others: and taking a leadership position in confronting the world's major crises.
I would think that you would need a more positive premise for the progressive cause to be successful.
"Adore your God. Reverence and cherish your parents. Love your neighbor as yourself, and your country more then yourself. Be just. Be true." Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Jefferson Smith - February 21, 1825
Thomas Jefferson
b.) Your attribution is correct (Ben Franklin, not Jefferson)
c.) We give up liberty for safety all the time. For instance, to have police around means giving up liberty (to gain safety), but I've never heard anyone spout off this quote who was serious about abolishing the police to gain back every ounce of their natural rights. The importance is getting the balance right, not abolishing the social contract.
Jefferson's use demonstrates the point in reference to the above fatuous sentimentality about the "love" of country.
Stop looking for reasons to loath America and you may find that it's more than just a pretty good place to live.
Get out your Progressive hate-speech dictionary before you write something, then you won't sound so stupid.
We are all dumber for having read the above article and subsequent comments, mine included.
Google was hatched out of a research university underwritten with oodles and boodles of government grants. Government research grants have made many of the lucky ones wildly rich.
Twenty years from now, let’s revisit this topic.
Opposing monopolies helps the world advance more quickly and more fairly.
Remember the American "Trust Busters" of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Your article sickens me. Is there nothing worth fighting for? We have the highest standard of living compared to ANYWHERE. WE consume because we have the freedom of choice.
Empire? I doubt it...Germany? Italy? Japan? Korea? Those locations were paid for in blood. Go read your history again. If the POTUS or VP had violated the Constitution, then the Speaker of the House would be duty bound to present Articles of Impeachment. Not to do so would be a dereliction of duty. Again, you would know this if you new anything about the country you so vehemently despise. The American people are the most benevolent on the planet. Again...if you had done your homework you would know that. I do not agree with you but I would fight to the death to preserve your right to think as you do (I have worn the uniform of this nation for over 26 years)-
I won't even ask you to say thank you.
PS- Intellectually, George Carlin is way out of your league. Why don't you confine your journalistic talents to women's fashions or something along that line.
Are you referring to British health care, where the nightmare tales accumulate? Are you referring to the 15,000 elderly French that died during a heat wave, a heat wave that would be an ordinary summer in Texas? Are you referring to the bloated welfare system in much of Western Europe which goes hand in hand with much higher unemployment rates than in the US and with a much worse record at job creation than the US? Are you referring to a continent that has so little faith in the future that its fertility rate is far behind replacement levels in many countries?
Is my pointing this out to you an indication that I am one of the people that is “all that is wrong with the USA?”
You've got to be kidding. Just because your views are being criticised doesn't mean anyone is trying to "crush your spirit". It's called freedom of speech. You should learn what it really means.
For example: the tens of millions of Chinese who died during the Great Leap
Forward because following Chairman Mao's cockamanie ideas on increasing agricultural production resulted in famine. Mao's hubris, yes. Nationalism? I fail to see how.
Ditto for those lost in Stalin's Gulag.
Pol Pot? Those were CAMBODIANS.
The ignorance of your statement shows a fifth grade level of historical knowledge, if that.
It's actually quite tragic-- the progressive can't fit in, yet stomps their feet and screams that they are much smarter, much more worldly. The world would be a better place, if everyone would just listen.
Since you do not support your country....then I assume you do not support Obama for President since he claims to think this is a great country?
I think you will find yourself alone in your thinking.
Keeping a nation on a decent and generally progressive path is NO EASY FEAT!!! Most of those flag wavers you despise are struggling to stay on the right path and stay positive and realize it would be much harder just about anywhere on the planet. They realize the only other comparably well-off nations are much smaller and more racially homogenous. They are relieved to be in the company of different people who are all willing to look at the glass as half full for one day out of the year.
Extrapolating from where this country has been to where it is and continuing out and up to where (based on the trajectory) can likely be if we all stay positive blows your BS article out of it's half-empty glass.
And besides, I AM proud of The Dominion of Canada, too. Still have the Queen on the coin of the Realm at all that!
Sure we're not perfect. But throughout the years Americans as a whole have strived to project the cornerstone values as our young nation continued to evolve. (Hence the civil rights movement, the constant striking down of old laws and enforcement of new ones to maintain justice through harsh examination, and most recently the validation of gay marriage to ensure equal rights to every american citizen)
Patriotism is honoring the right and good values one's nation stands for. Holidays such as Independence Day is a time to recognize the things America has done right, but also to reflect on what we can do to make it better.
Not rant about its imperfections.
America is a great country (and I and many others would argue, the greatest country in the world) because we enjoy the greatest combination of freedom and opportunity that exists in the world for the greatest number of people, including the freedom to spout the drivel you write in your piece. This doesn’t mean we have to denigrate other countries or invade them as a result of this “patriotism” (if that’s what you want to call a feeling that America is a great or even the greatest country in the world), but it does imply that we should be thankful for the freedoms and opportunity our country/form of (self-)government affords us, especially on July 4. For me, the American experiment begun by our founders back in 1776 has been as much about, and continues to be about, extending those freedoms and that opportunity to ever-widening classes of people, both within this country and in other parts of the world (in terms of inspiring millions of immigrants to uproot their lives and move here as well as serving as a model around which other countries can (re)fashion their politico-economic systems). Some other countries may have (or be perceived to have) more civil rights and civil liberties (more freedom?), but they also generally have much higher taxes and significantly stricter/complicated economic systems and regulations (less opportunity). Some countries that offer perhaps equal or better economic opportunities (maybe some examples in Asia) generally are much more authoritarian (think Singapore with all the caning for spitting your gum out on the sidewalk). It’s really hard, perhaps impossible, to find another country that balances freedom and opportunity quite as well as America does and has done over the years.
Without addressing each of your criticisms (some of which are more egregious than others, particularly those that conflate ethnic- or even tribal-based “nationalism” with patriotism in a diverse, pluralistic society such as America), perhaps you should consider:
Americans produce roughly 25% of the world’s goods and services despite being only 5% of the global population. Rather than view this as evidence of being the most productive society on the face of the planet (and do you think our unique, dare we say it, “American” system has something to do with it?), you, and many other neo-Malthusians within the hard left/environmental movement, treat this as evidence of either greed or environmental indifference. We make about 25% of all the world’s stuff and we account for about 25% of the resources used in the world each year in doing so. Duh. Leave that one out from next year’s July 4th screed, please.
Also, Kennedy's Inaugural words inspired thousands of people (including many of those narcissistic baby boomers) to do altruistic things like joining the Peace Corps; his words echo from beyond the grave to inspire people like me (Gen Xer) who weren’t even born when he challenged Americans to look beyond purely selfish goals and desires -- no one has taken them to support goose-stepping on the Mall a la Berlin 1933. It would be a better country if more politicians, both on the left and the right, could, like Kennedy, inspire new generations of Americans to new heights of self-sacrifice, be it through volunteering in non-profit organizations, or joining our armed forces in this time of violent conflict visited upon us to help defend our freedoms, rather than financially-directed appeals such as calling for more charitable contributions (those on the right, perhaps) or accepting higher tax rates (those on the left).
Perhaps you don’t want to accept it, but until the rest of the world becomes a lot more like America in terms of setting up an enduring system that maximizes BOTH freedom and opportunity (not just one of these, mind you), America is the best and increasingly only game in town.
Fantasy Island!
Gibberish
My country (New Zealand) is receiving record hits from Americans on our immigration website. Perhaps they feel safer out of their own country. Or perhaps is it that when they get permanent residency, and become NZ citizens, that they will qualify for free healthcare which we enjoy here - and have for many years.
Unlike the sad story of guy in NY who had to sell his home to pay his hospital bill, this would never happen in my country. You can have America and its racist, violent society. You can die in foreign countries on behalf of the multi-nationals - Bush's big-oil friends, but don't expect us to follow suit. None of our young are dying in Iraq on behalf of America.
The threats to Iran by a country which has 10,000 nuclear weapons just leaves us cold. America's hypocrisy knows no bounds. America has not learned it lesson from Vietnam - another lost cause.
Americans are welcome here. We know they want to escape the criminals who have taken their country into a war which is reviled around the world and bankrupted their country.
And I see no change no matter who is elected president.
A Patriot
It's a free country, and he can say what he wants. You can say what you want, too, but the least you could do is hear the man out first. Your knee-jerk, thoughtless response only proves his point.
Or perhaps you see it as your patriotic duty to partially read essays on liberal websites and write responses to them. A grateful nation salutes you.
Grow up little Matthew.
But on the other hand, Mr. Rothschild, I really do appreciate your article. Let's hope Barack H Obama agrees with you and makes it clear that he does.
and despite what 90% of the respondants here let dribble from their mouths, it's productive remain unsatisfied with the quality of life in the US (or anywere). to never be satisfied is a quality that leads to progression, not regression.
That is the reason more people immigrate to this country than any other.
Rothschild: You forgot to mention due to the generosity of America, we donate to worthy causes at the rate of $500,000 hour. One of MANY great things about this country, in spite of worthless whiners like yourself.
fools like this author exude ego and often think ideas like this are just soooo smart and cutting edge. i'm always left unimpressed.
Thank you.
I've seen the Author before. He/She is the one that comes to town meetings, have nothing but complaints, no suggestions, and refuse to help anybody out. These excuses for people always refer to " THEY " as being the ones that try to make things better and end up getting better as a unexpected result.
Admit it; We would be a better society without these leeches.
This article is just another example of how the left continues to be wrong on just about every issue. The left's hate of America continues, unabated. Thankfully, you're in the minority.
I must say that this really reads like a high school essay, full of rant and anger, and misguided and unearned scorn.
More importantly, I think you're really missing out on one of the true joys in life. To feel a love for country, despite its flaws; to admire and take lessons from its history, despite some grave errors of action or inaction; to be thankful for the opportunities this great nation offers to all; to know that there are ideals that this country offers, too, and though it may not meet them often enough, it still holds them; to appreciate your fellow citizens, wish them well, and give them the benefit of the doubt; to celebrate this love of country with those fellow citizens at a celebration like a 4th of July parade.
I know you're too cool, or angry, but I do wish you could know the joy that feeling and perspective brings.
Happy 4th to you.
Bill
After saving Europe from domination in 1917 it took no land, reperations and asked only that countries band together to prevent another war
After saving Europe (again) from a amdman, it took no territory, exacted no tribute and rebuilt its enemies into welathy liberal democracies
During an era of supposed clashes of civilizations it has protect Muslims from Christians in Bosnia and Kosovo
It sends people and supplies to any country in the world that experiences natural disaters.
It takes in immigrants from the whole world ad allows them a chance to proser and become part of the fabric of the country. Compare the wealthy Arab suburbs in Michigan to the impoversihed banliues fo Paris.
Has created the most widely ethnically diverse polity that leaves peacefully together the vast majority of the time EVER IN THE HIOSTORY OF THE WORLD.
US citizens send more private money aborad to needy people than other governments send
As for the rest of our article, you conflate patriotism with nationalism which is stupid. Every basic solcial scientist distinguishes between the two.
You mock the "love my country because it is mine" idea, but do we not do this in families. Who really thinks that their dad is "World greatest Dad" that it says on the card. Who cares? he is my dad and that is enough.
FInally, if America sucks as much as ytou claim, why does everyone in the entire freakin developing world want to come here. because they think they will be abused, put in a ghetto and marginalized. No because their cousin came en years ago, got a job driving a cab, went to community college, started a business and now owns a home.
Thats a great country.
PS The History lesson above is jingoistic at best.
If only you were a critical thinker and could use those skills, then perhaps you could help make your country that great country about which you dream.
In addition, anyone can spin an article with useless facts and make us look like a greedy nation. How come he only mentions what the US consumes and not what is produces. And if he hates it here so much then why doesn't he just take his impressive skills, six figure salary, and upper middle class lifestyle and move to a more social country??
What is deserving of patriotism is not blind allegiance, not unquestioning faith, but a recognition, on one special day of the year, that this nation, more than any other, begets voluteeers to willing go and die so we might live in freedom. I do not, for the life of me, understand how that escapes an otherwise intelligent man such as Carlin. Try spewing this in China sometime, and I think the difference will become apparrent.
Of course printing the same things in those countries would be pretty bad for your health.
Just as I think you're completely wrong, I will still defend your right to voice that opinion.
Stupidity in government is not as much of a threat to our way of life, as is the vilification of our way of life. Mark Twain said it best, "loyalty to the country always. Loyalty to the government when it deserves it."
God Bless America.
Like you, though, I'm effete enough to be chary of patriotism. I'm not quite as far gone as you, perhaps because I have a better grasp of history (Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot nationalists?)
Plus, I know one factor responsible for far more blood than those you cite... weakness. Would I rather live in a country with a bunch of enlightened whiners like you or with a bunch of rowdy, unenlightened flag wavers? "Oh-oh say can you see..."
I’m a flag-waving red-white-and-blue American patriot *because* I support the principles enunciated by Jefferson in the Declaration, by Washington in his Farewell Address, by Jefferson in his First Inaugural, and by J. Q. Adams when he declared that America “goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.”
Let us not cede the word “patriot” to the madmen who control the current Administration. There are good men and women of both parties, true patriots, who want an end to this madness: even within the GOP, there is Presidential candidate Ron Paul, who opposed this war from the very beginning. Paul Craig Roberts, a high Treasury official under Reagan, has called for impeachment of Bush-Cheney because of their war crimes. And of course, Reagan’s former Navy Secretary, Jim Webb, switched parties and is now the Democratic Senator from Virginia because of this needless war.
Peter Beinart, on the other hand, backed the war in the beginning and is now opportunistically opposing it: In my book, Beinart will never be anything but a traitor to his country.
True patriots want their country to do what is right. Bush, Cheney, Beinart et al, are men who so little love their country that they will sell it out for the prizes of fame and power.
Dave Miller in Sacramento
no one questions the respect for achievements and moral values of this nations - but patriotism in the meaning of an "excitement for my country" has been corrupted, sprinkled with religious references and sold as an antidote for a war to come... right from the beginning, this was about believing in our leader, either for or against us (who does this look backwards, yes, to other countries who not supported this scam AND are pretty decent democracies with higher standards of income and so on than the US) waving the flags, greeting the war or elsewhere you are not supporting the troops - un-american, un-patriotic, luckily we had the patriot act!!
True, too much pride, or unquestioned pride, can lead to great evil, but great evil also comes from people who think they have all the answers and anyone who disgrees with them is holding back "progress".
Pride coupled with a healthy dose of questioning authority, that will do for me. I think thats how most sane, rational people feel.
Isn't that right Mr. ROTHSCHILD?
Love It or Leave It
One of the most moving moments in my life was attending a "pow-wow" in Cherokee, NC. Do you know how seriously Native Americans there took Patriotism for AMERICA? There were veterans groups, and an especially moving tribute to fallen warriors. There was a mother who had lost her son while he was serving our nation and she danced a special memorial dance on behalf of all mothers who lose their sons and daughters to war. The American flag was treated with the utmost respect. If you have a chance to watch "Flags of Our Fathers" or "Letters from Iwo Jima" or "United 93" you would have to have a heart of stone not feel pride and patriotism for those that gave their lives so that you can freely write such an immature, cynical and elitist piece of editorial garbage.
You take for granted what you have in this country. This is the only western nation where freedom of speech is guaranteed. Canadians scoff at the idea of free speech, calling it an "American" idea. Shouldn't that just make you a little bit proud of your country?
The notion that throwing money at poverty will solve it is ridiculous. Look at what the world has been doing for the last 50 years in Africa, and problems have only gotten worse. Yes, we need to help our fellow men, and Americans do that through private charities more than any other nation on earth. (Another reason to be proud of America, by the way.) But until the people in Africa stand up for themselves and get rid of the tyrants, they will remain a tumultuous mess where the most unspeakable tragedies happen on a regular basis. I would be all for our troops (as well as the rest of the free world's armies) standing by their sides to help them achieve this goal and become a more self-sustaining continent.
Joel
Who never to himself hath said,
This is my own, my native land!
Whose heart hath ne'er within him burned,
As home his footsteps he hath turned
From wandering on a foreign strand!
If such there breathe, go, mark him well;
For him no minstrel raptures swell;
High though his titles, proud his name,
Boundless his wealth as wish can claim
Despite those titles, power, and pelf,
The wretch, concentred all in self,
Living, shall forfeit fair renown,
And, doubly dying, shall go down
To the vile dust from whence he sprung,
Unwept, unhonored , and unsung.
-Sir Walter Scott
When first we practise to deceive!
Sir Walter Scott, Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.
Is it still possible for us to be “fellow”. I still hang on to that small hope of mine that it is. Please tell me - does it make our nation (or world) stronger if we bicker, or if we hear one another's view and actually listen? What good is this freedom of speech if all we are going to use it for is to launch insults at each other?
Liberal Scum? Warmongering Barbarians?
It pains me deeply that right now I do not feel as if we are the United States of America. We are the Blue and Red states of America, each side just as narcissistic, hypocritical, and self righteous as the other.
Matthew’s point that blind nationalism was used to justify some of humanity’s most obscene atrocities should be well taken. When our popular mindset was summed up in the words “we’ll stick a boot up your as$, it’s the American way!” then shouldn’t that trigger in our minds that we ought to do some self examination so that we don’t find ourselves walking down the same dark path that other nationalists have taken? We would commit genocide on millions of innocents if we really did “bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran” as McCain once joked to the tune of the Beach Boys. Are any of us so naïve as to think ourselves immune to doing wicked things just because we’re the country that founded democracy? Because we are militarily the most powerful country on earth, we must be sober in our actions. If we let nationalism guide our policy, we can end up committing dreadful crimes that we regret for decades, because unlike Nazi’s and Communists, we Americans have high respect for life and we do have a conscience (even though our politicians and pundits are often quite shameless). I agree with him that being #1 in the world is not something that every country can do, and by many measures we are not #1 – education for example. There’s plenty of room for us to improve as a country. It is a good thing that other countries are stepping up to the plate and challenging our place in the world. We don’t always have to be the best at everything, and it is the nature of competition that no one stays on top forever. That’s fine. Competition is what makes not just America strong, but humanity strong.
I don’t agree with everything Matthew is saying, however. His tone is definitely elitist, smug, and disrespectful to those of us who do honor the United States and what it stands for and want to celebrate its founding. Martin, for the most part your comments were thoughtful and fair so rather than make them again I will just refer people to read your post. But I will also add that to me it doesn’t really matter if your assertion that we are the best country in the world is true or not. Who really cares if we are “the best”? That is a very moot thing for the average person like me, leave that kind of pride to imperialists who want to dominate everyone else. What ought to matter to us is if our children have good educations, if we have good health, if our justice system defends us from criminals, our armies defend us from harm, and if we have the opportunity to live well and advance ourselves. What ought to matter more than being better than others is being the best that we can be. That means taking ideas that other people have and listening to them, considering them, and where beneficial adopting them, even if we don’t agree with all of the perspectives of the people that came up with those ideas. It also means not tearing each other down with this partisan foolishness and “we’re better than you” mentalities. Thank you for your time, fellow American.
People are PROUD of their country (or not) because it does or does not represent admirable ideals and behave admirably as a society and polity.
I wish Michelle Obama had made this distinction; I wish more Americans realized that loving your country based simply on its being HOME, without having to justify it on abstract principles, is a perfectly fine place to start, though it's better not to stay there too long.
We have much less to be proud of now than we did eight years ago, but it's simplistic and puerile to whine that we are all bad. Whoever referred to "the perfect being the enemy of the good" in a previous post was right on.
Country of citizenship is not a factor in determining any person's moral worth.
Thanks for your reply. You use the reverse of the ad hominem - "Ghandi said it so it must be right". But, assuming that quotation meant what you imply it does mean (i.e., not a mere play on the fact that the word internationalist includes the word nationalist), it is a non sequitur par excellence. It has the same meaning as
"You can't be a man without being a woman"
or
"You can't be tolerant without being a bigot"
Nationalism is putting the interests of "people of your nation" (a concept impossible to define rationally, but that's a point for another day) above those of people of other nations. Internationalism is judging people's moral worth without regard to their nationality. The two concepts are, by definition, diametrically opposed.
Matthew - you were right on, i could not have said it better. Why must we always insist that we're the greatest nation in history? Why must we insist that everyone bow down to the country as if it is a god-like figure? I've been to about many other western nations in my lifetime and NONE of them carry the same arrogant attitude that we do. What's wrong with Canada? Belgium? Germany? The Netherlands are a whole lot freer than we are!
Point is, be proud of who you are and where you come from... but do not resort to blind nationalism by insisting that we're always the "best"
I think I read somewhere that ""We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness..." This applies to you not unless you are native American Indian, African American, Iraqi, Iranian, Phillipino, Haitian, Grenadan, Mexican and ...... (name your country). Then the Americans and British have a right to rule you or kill as many of you as they want. Iraqi people have no rights because they are not created "equal" to us. They better do what we tell them.
I also read that the Bill of Rights protects the freedoms of speech, press, and religion; the right to keep and bear arms; the freedom of assembly; the freedom to petition; and prohibits unreasonable search and seizure; cruel and unusual punishment; and compelled self-incrimination. The Bill of Rights also prohibits Congress from making any law respecting establishment of religion and prohibits the Federal Government from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
This applies to you not unless you are a Muslim. In that case you better not run for an elected office in USA.
We as Americans have definitely lost a lot of civil liberties in the last 7 1/2 years that were part of the original Constitution. We also have lost our moral compass when we torture people (it puts us in the same league as terrorists), attack countries that have not threatened us, keep people indefinitely in GITMO, tolerate prisoner abuse in Abu Ghraib, rendition people to other countries to torture for us - all in name of Security.
Now taking a little different view:
Without a doubt, American experiment is the greatest society organizing experience in the history of mankind.
Concept of Nation-State that led to rise of nationalism and patriotism is debatable in a muti-ethnic, multi-religion society that America is today. In Europe when the concept of Nation-State" originated, the society was fairly homogeneous and Christian. It worked well until various divisions of Christianity and religious persecution that resulted in a lot of Euorpeans coming to United States. It did not work for the tribal and feudal part of the world - where majority of people lived at that time and they still do. UK, Spain and France basically subdivided the world land mass and drew artificial boundaries that are called "Countries" or "Nations" today. I am not saying whether that was good or bad, just that it happened. And it did not come from indigenous peoples. It was forced upon them by guns. That is probably one of the reasons that most of the nations do not work as well as USA does where the democracy and fabric holding the society together was "internally driven" by the people who occupied this land mass.
We as American still enjoy more freedoms than any place else on this earth. And, we should be thankful for that. Being patriotic does not mean that you can not criticize what is wrong. As a matter of fact, a true Patriot tries to improve the situation and right the wrong. You do not have to hide behind the flag and servitude of the Government to be a true patriot. Remember Patric Henry "Give me liberty or give me death".
America is a great nation today for its people. But the concept of nation-state may have gone past its usefulness in a multi-cultural and multi-ethnic society. However , the values enshrined in the American experience - the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution and The Bill of Rights are and will forever remain a shining light for its people and rest of the world to follow.
I
Please leave MY country...you ARE ANTI-AMERICAN and anti-patriotic. No one forced me to voluntarily risk my life defending this country and its founding principals (which you know or care NOTHING FOR or of).
You are a socialist, Marxist, Dim-liberal that hates America, its traditions, and all it stands for...what's new? You leftists have been trying to destroy this country for over 40 years instead of moving to the former USSR or Europe where they love socialism, are moving toward it, or trying to reinstitute it.
Quit trying to destroy MY country...its not yours...you never put your life on the line to protect it and you don't love it...so it indeed is not yours...please leave...Canada, Europe, or Cuba would be glad to have you...you can be taxed at a rate you have always dreamed about (80-90%) and the government can regulate everything about your life from when you take a shit to how many sheets of toilet tissue you can use to wipe your ass depending on your global warming foot print.
Carry you ass!
LB
Combat Veteran - USMC
Katy, TX
PS It's not your country, it's our country and you are welcome to argue about it.
How long would the Constitution and your rights last without somebody willing to defend it?
You need to get your money back from whatever institution granted you your degree.
Cheers!
That seems to be the reason that Matt spends everyday at the Progressive. He is defending the Constitution. We thank Matt for doing the heavy lifting. Bravo Matt!
Adams, Jefferson, and the other framers wrote the Constitution. They, along
with the other signers would have been hung for treason if PATRIOTS, bound
by their convictions did not pay the price with blood. No amount of eloquent
words or snappy phrases can change that fact. This like some of your other
comments are internet equivalent of farting then leaving the room.
If you can read this-thank a teacher.
If you are reading this in English, thank a SOLDIER.
cheers-
At the Progressive, Matt is defending the Constitution. We thank Matt for doing the heavy lifting. Bravo Matt!
the Constitution.
Once again you make a statement and show no substance.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better
than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not
your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you.
May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were
our countrymen."- Samuel Adams
Self indulgent twaddle indeed.
I do forgive you.
At the Progressive, Matt is defending the Constitution. We thank Matt for doing the heavy lifting. Bravo Matt!
denied their civil rights by this government for something that they have
written? I could come up with a short list of those that SHOULD HAVE BEEN
prosecuted, but the list of those tortured, incarcerated, or murdered by the
US Government is nonexistent. How does this protect the Constitution?
Perhaps you confuse exercising a right with protecting one?
Would you have the courage to say that to that Marine up close and personal?
Doubt it-
Cheers
isn't the right course for a discussion site either, but I responded that
way because that's what I thought you were doing. So, what I should have
said is this: Your service to this country, while laudable has no bearing
on the validity of your argument, nor does it mitigate your belligerence.
origonal poster I responded to. As to your question: What does that have
to do with anything? Seriously, I'm curious.
My point is just what I said...you called JB an "ignorant half wit" rather than respond intellectually. I am not picking on you for your stance...it was just a matter of convenience. Quite a few "Patriots" are guilty of the same. "Your service to this country, while laudable has no bearing on the validity of your argument, nor does it mitigate your belligerence." Is very well said.
Cheers-
Y.O>
Thank you for your service.
Cheers!
Y.O.
We make mistakes. We make bad mistakes. But, would you rather the Russians or the Chinese be the lone superpower?
You seem to dislike nationalism. What is the better alternative???
Just wanted to say, good article. I completely agree and never understood how being American made me the "best" or "better" than anyone else. I like this country and I like living here, but that's as far as it goes. The superiority complex that has taken over America is exactly the reason why so many around the world dislike us (and im not just talking about the Middle East). Anyway, good article.
Maybe you don't think so but ask any of the thousands of Africans, Latin Americans and Europeans streaming into this country every day. They can't all be wrong.
However giving a greater portion of our wealth to help third-world nations, though helping is not a bad idea in and of itself, giving more aid would not make us any safer. The 800 pound gorilla in the room is again religion. As an example, consider this; there will never be any peace in the Middle East for the simple reason that BOTH sides firmly believe that God conferred upon them certain rights. The right to the Middle East. It is theirs by divine right. This doesn’t leave any room for compromise. Thus the Middle East will never have peace until one side or the other either dies out or sees beyond religion. The second is as unlikely to happen as the first since both sides define themselves by their religions. In other words, people would have to deny their own existence to have peace. And it is this way on both sides. Any Arab or Jewish leader who tries to alter the course will be killed. Sad, but true.
But anytime you help someone it cannot be totally bad.
>The right to the Middle East. It is theirs by divine right.
This should read: The right to the Middle East. It is theirs by divine right and not by science and reason.
Someone once said, "every Ship of State sails on a river of darkness." The question is how deep run the waters and in which direction does it sail.
Congratulations Mr. Mathews, this is one of the best articles I have read in a long time.
This isn't the land of the free, unless you're rich. Most immigrants are treated very badly here they want to save up and move back to their country. With people like you scum telling folks to leave your country why not try to be a better representative of your nation and make others feel welcome. No wonder why some many countries dislike the U.S.
You patriots are what make this country good or bad try your best to make a change instead of insulting begin help or educating others that your are not money hunger creatures. When it comes down to it will your country support you? Who really cares about your life?
Instead of helping out Africa why don't we start helping out our homeless children,and people. Did you know in this country people yell at you to get a job your lazy homeless bum when in fact almost all employers require a place of residence and someone who doesn't smell bad.
How can you say we are better than everyone else when
"We Are All One"
Last I checked, Muslims in the US. had an income higher than the average American. Muslims in the US are treated much better than non-Muslims are treated in Muslim countries ,for starters. Does the US ban the Koran, as Saudi Arabia does the Bible? Are Muslims beheaded here, the way that Christians or Jews have been in Indonesia and Pakistan? Muslims have the freedom to worship as they see fit in this country. Try being a Sunni in Iran, or a Shiite in Saudi Arabia. Or a Sufi , for that matter. Try being a Bahai in Iran. That there hasn’t been an attack in this country since 9/11 indicates that there have been 1) a fair amount of Muslims in the US reporting on suspicious activity, or 2) a certain amount of satisfaction with how they are treated in the US.
Of course, if you wish to kowtow to the Wahabi-funded C.A.I.R., or are of the opinion that Muslim cabbies should have the right to refuse to transport someone who is carrying alcoholic beverages, you would have a different point of view.
Most immigrants are treated very badly here they want to save up and move back to their country
I know quite a few home-owning immigrants in my neighborhood: now US citizens. I bought my place from an immigrant. He has no intentions whatsoever of moving back. Treated very badly here? There has always been a certain proportion of immigrants who moved back. I read somewhere that about a third of immigrants from Italy from the late 1800s moved back to Italy. If immigrants are treated so badly here, then why do they keep coming here, legally or otherwise?
BTW, to call people “scum” who disagree with your point of view is NOT going to help convince others of your point of view.
For anyone who believes that the US is the “great sinner,” I very strongly suggest that said person work overseas several years. I did. From the other side , the US looks pretty good. No, the US isn’t perfect, but compared to what is out there, we do not suffer by comparison. Not at all. Andate vos, pues.
The principles (separation of powers, individual liberties, government under law, etc.) that make us great are worth fighting for in order to preserve. Being willing to accept losses of these principles (or to praise those who damage them, or to condemn as traitors those who want to preserve them even if it means criticizing a Leader) seems to miss the point of being "patriotic."
Patriotism is not about bragging or feeling superior, it is about giving thanks and appreciation to the country which has given us unprecedented freedom and opportunity. How unfortunate that this bitter, petty, liberal can only lash out at America.
Sorry, Matthew, but trying to blame "patriotism" for the Iraq War is a bit out of your leauge. "Love of America" hasn't even shown up on the ripest of the moonbat's list of possible war justifications. The Cuban Missile Crisis is even funnier. You realize that it was largely engineered by your "progressive" hero Che, right? America peacefully disarmed the crisis that was started by a bunch of bloodthirsty leftists.
It's cliched to say so, but methinks thou dost protest too much. The guilt and loathing are slathered on a bit too thick to be taken seriously...especially when pockmarked with so many historical innacuracies. But the existence of this article is proof of America's greatness. You have the freedom to speak out against the country and the government. Try it in China and you'll get run over by tanks like in Tienannmen Square. Try it in Sudan or one of the many other African dictatorships and the government will send death squads to your house. Try it in Canada and you might get prosecuted by their "Human Rights Commissions" like Mark Stein.
I fight against what you say, but I defend your right to say it. America is one of the only countries on Earth that gives you that right, and that's only one of the reasons that it is worthy of love and respect. That's why every year, million of immigrants flee their countries to come here to seek a better life.
Franklin was right when he said:
"When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
I'm envious. Sir. I wish I'd written it myself.
SJ
Your comments are old and recycled. Only someone intellectually bankrupt would actually believe them. Either that or some college kid... My favorite is the "empire" shtick. Do your homework and find out why our troops are overseas. It is because of a war. Empire...sure. We tell the Germans, Italians, Japanese, and Koreans what to do- and the annual tribute payments help balance the budget....right.
My other favorite is the Bush and Company violated the Constitution. I will play into your fantasy. Suppose the president was guilty of that screed. The Speaker of the House would be duty-bound to act and present articles of impeachment. Not to do so would be a dereliction of duty. Where are they? Oh yes, I almost forgot....the last thing the Congress did was to pass the "Primate Protection Act" or something of equal nonsense.
Tell me why you hate your country...is it because you grew up protected from the evil in this world? Is it because your over indulgent parents gave you everything including a college education? Have you ever had to work for anything in you life? Probably not.
Matt, there are some things worth fighting for. To protect family, home, and way of life are but a few. The job that you enjoy now was bought and paid for in blood. Not the blood of the activist, radical college professor, or ACLU lawyer Better men than you or I paid the price with their lives.
I wore the uniform of the United States for over 26 years to protect YOUR right to be ignorant. You don't even have to thank me Matt. It was an honor. But you don't know what that means either.
Until you (or someone you value) stand in someone else's place in defense of your family, friends, neighbors, and yes - even your many political enemies - you will never know what patriotism means. And yet it doesn't matter, because others do. As a result, you are irrelevant on this and other civil liberties.
As long as there are many in this country who believe in individual and corporate sacrifice on behalf of the liberties you value so much - and also those you don't apparently value at all - you will remain free to question their patriotism.
But that doesn't make you any less a moron.
We are the greatest nation.
Our 10,000 nuclear weapons? Yes, because with those we faced down the USSR who with their thousands of nuclear warheads would have spread their totalitarian regime across the globe.
Our troops stationed in 120 countries? Most those troops stationed at embassies, stations of diplomacy, meaning that we have peaceful relations with most countries and are there invitation, that makes us great.
We consume more resources because we are more productive & industrious. This adds to our wealth which we (both government and private citizens) are more generous with.
The distribution of our wealth demonstrates that we are MORE equal. Before the birth of this nation the distribution of wealth was the one man (king) controlled all of the wealth while everyone else had nothing and the trend continues to this day in other totalitarian states. In the United States, anyone and everyone has the opportunity become wealthy. That makes us great.
Corporations represent democracy and freedom. Corporations are embodied by many people (often times the people who work there) taking ownership of a company and sharing its profits among themselves (ironically this is what socialism purports to do but fails at.)
Our infant mortality rate is worse than you think and is a strike against the "great" column, I call it abortion.
At Abu Graib, we put a stop to it once it came out that is more than can be said for others. At Guantanamo, the prisoners have it better than our own prisoners. So much so that the bad stories have to made up (Koran flushing anyone?)
For all of the babble about Bush/Cheney assaulting rights and liberties? Exactly which of your rights have been violated by Bush/Cheney? Compare that to the recent fight we just had in the Supreme Court where so called "Progressives" tried to literally remove an amendment from the Constitution. But the people won that one, the Constitution won that one and that makes us great.
The United States of America, whether you love or whether you hate, it's the best thing going today.
Ohh...yes...America the Ugly
it's so ugly that the majority of the Former Soviet Unions has been banging on Nato's door for 20 years...screaming "Please let me in"
Yes...America the Ugly...the place where people who have never known true hunger or true oppression scream endlessly how they are hungry and oppressed.
The UN defines poverty as living on less than $2/day or roughly $700 a year...if you are lucky enough to have been born "American" your government will insure you never know such poverty. A 'right' 2/3rds of the worlds inhabitants do not have.
Oh yes...and oppressed...one can walk pass a police station holding a sign proclaiming the evilness of America's leaders and not fear of arrest. A freedom 2/3rds of the worlds inhabitants do not have.
Yes..lets put patriotism on the shelf....if we need flags and fireworks and martial music to remind us what we have then we don't deserve to have it.
One hundred and seventeen years ago, Henry Adams began his multi-volume A History of the United States by examining the intellectual challenges faced by his great-grandfather’s – President John Adams’s – generation. Could this new polity of theirs “create and maintain in the mass of mankind those habits of mind which had hitherto belonged to men of science alone. Could it produce, or was it compatible with, the differentiation of a higher variety of the human race? Nothing less than this was necessary for its complete success.” (Vol. I, p. 184)
Sorry to say, Henry, if these thoughtless and emotional responses are today’s rational discourse, we haven’t made it even close to “complete success.” Ad hominem attacks are not arguments, they are a classically fallacious response to argument. “Shut up!” he reasoned; “Go to Cuba!” she rationally asserted; “Nah, nah, you’re not only wrong but your stupid!” he countered to a point supported by clear evidence.
Mike Wallace, in a 1958 interview with Adlai Stevenson said:"An old political axiom says, 'People get the kind of government they deserve.'” This axiom is often attributed to Stevenson, but the source doesn't matter. What does matter is that the puerile rants against a thoughtful musing on patriotism demonstrate the truth of the axiom: we got the government we deserved in 2000 and 2004. One can only hope that we don't deserve McCain.
If your country is so besmirched in your eyes, I would ask you: can you find a better one? What I find rather insulting from a lot of liberals is the implicit assumption that the U.S .is so horrible UNLESS the U.S. does EXACTLY what liberals say it should do. This is one reason why non-liberals, conservatives included, get up in arms when liberals start with the "oh so bad" litany.
You accuse those who disagree with you of being uncivil, but at the same time, you also participate in incivility towards those who disagree with you: vicious, vile and vituperative,..puerile rants. Physician, heal thyself.
Certainly your smug and self-righteous tone will do little to convince me. Since Ike and Adlai, and perhaps before, Liberals paint themselves as so superior to those knuckle-dragging behemoths that disagree with them : "vicious, vile and vituperative,..puerile rants," as you state. BTW, I used to be a liberal, until I tested my liberal beliefs with the reality of the world.
Perhaps the problem is that liberals are not used to having their ideas challenged, associating only with like-minded, and thus react as you did when you come into contact with people who disagree with them. From an early age, I was used to dealing in a civil manner with people with whom I disagreed on some issue, as I did not see eye to eye with my beloved grandmother on religion and Civil Rights. While we did not hide our disagreements, neither did we hide our regard for each other.
Liberals need some practice in that. Really.
If quotes are used, I always liked Ambrose Bierce:
PATRIOT, n. One to whom the interests of a part seem superior to
those of the whole. The dupe of statesmen and the tool of conquerors.
PATRIOTISM, n. Combustible rubbish read to the torch of any one
ambitious to illuminate his name.
In Dr. Johnson's famous dictionary patriotism is defined as the
last resort of a scoundrel. With all due respect to an enlightened
but inferior lexicographer I beg to submit that it is the first.
Or since one of the people meantioned Germany, how about this:
"Why, of course, the people don't want war," Goering shrugged. "Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship."
"There is one difference," I pointed out. "In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars."
"Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."
Hermann Goering
When they came for the communists, I was silent, because I was not a communist;
When they came for the socialists, I was silent, because I was not a socialist;
When they came for the trade unionists, I did not protest, because I was not a trade unionist;
When they came for the Jews, I did not protest, because I was not a Jew;
When they came for me, there was no one left to protest on my behalf.
Martin Niemöller
But how about something totally unique: we think for ourselves instead of parroting the words of our "leaders". I keep thinking of a phrase used by a columnist I read. He called it the "dumbing down of America". If you truly patriotic, you will want what is best for the people of the country, because they are the country. Jefferson (remember him) thought it was the duty of a person to rebel against a government which had ceased to represent them. And now everyone seems to want walk in lockstep and goosestep into the sunset. By any sane definition, the government we now have is Fascist By definition.
Just leave, and don't come back, becuase it is the patriots that always kept America free.
Do NOT be surprised when GWB declares a state of emergency in which it is SIMPLY TOO DANGEROUS to have a transition in government or hand over governing to an "inexperienced" new administration in the midst of a 'national emergency' such as the bombing of Iran by Israel and OUR NEED to support them or the U.S. Navy attempting to keep Iran from blocking the shipping lanes in the Straights of Hormuz and the rest of the Middle Eastern nations opt in to defend Iran against the "freedom fighters" who have been occupying their neighbor Iraq for five years... FIVE YEARS SINCE "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" !!!!
Do NOT be surprised that Cheney/Bush ensconce themselves in another undetermined length of time in office. If you THINK this is outrageously impossible, you have NOT been paying attention to the more than 1,000 signing statements the administration has quietly used to change every piece of legislation he chooses to make it what they want, NOT what the representatives of the people have tried to enact.
PAY ATTENTION - QUESTION AUTHORITY - THAT IS PATRIOTISM AS WELL.
My advice is this: Get a big brown paper bag, breath in and out until you able to no longer quiver with rage.
I live in Australia. I've researched the history of this country. I'm fairly impressed with its constitution and its parliamentary process. I enjoy living in a country with fairly Western liberal ideals (compared to other countries)
I don't love my country. I don't think it's the greatest nation on Earth. I'd never leave or give up my citizenship though, but my reasoning goes along the lines of the adage: 'Home, Sweet Home'.
I know that no country is perfect. But I'm not an antipatriot because my country has made mistakes in the past, or the current government is incompetent. I'm an antipatriot because I don't get the "love" of ones country, like how you would love another person.
My country is a cool car. It's been brilliantly engineered and looks beautiful. And I would do everything possible to keep it running smoothly.
But I would never wave it's flag.
There have always been problems with American exceptionalism. We keep on finding ways to succeed, and to do amazing wonderful things.
This fellow seeks to criticize everything that MIGHT be wrong with America. Surely he is correct about some of the problems he identifies, but the idea that they disqualify us from being great is a pure joke.
And he leaves off a vast number of liberal idiocies that also threaten our greatness, preferring to focus solely on the potential risks on the conservative side. Such one-sidedness makes this fellow utterly irrelevant.
Sir, you can be a Patriot and still understand that we continue to reach for perfection, and always will have to reach; we'll never arrive. The fact that we continue to reach is amazing and admirable. You find our people and our nation itself steeped in hypocrisy. The truth is, we are far closer in action to our ideals than any other (powerful) country on the face of this earth and even throughout history.
Not at all perfect, but engaged in the unending pursuit towards perfection. I love this country. It is magnificent throughout all of history, and this is the best time on earth to be alive, solely because I am fortunate enough to have been born here, and to live here, in this great time.
It amazes me that these conversations can even take place. We are colonizers and occupiers and the original inhabitants of this land, who did very well for thousands of years, have to suffer through not only the pain of the genocide we committed upon them, but our self-congratulatory frenzy as the world's champions of freedom and democracy, two words that have entirely lost their meaning.
My culture is a disease. The best I can hope for is remission. If I could leave this stolen land, I would; but I don't belong anywhere else. True patriots, good on ya. Violent, angry defenders of the world-fuckers (who would as soon fuck you as anyone else), good on ya. Some day, a real rain will come.
I feel sorry for you. Such self-hatred is self destructive. Very simple solution: go back to a country from where your ancestors immigrated. It's that simple. Some Russians whose ancestors moved from Germany over 200 years ago have immigrated to Germany. It can be done.
If you do not, you are simply taking a morally inconsistent stand. If you are ashamed of being a colonizer and occupier, if you feel guilt for that, there is a simple solution: leave. Otherwise, you are no better than the evil occupiers and colonizers that you so decry.
Please go to a place that you can be proud of.
If someone who owns slaves feels guilty about owning slaves, one can get rid of the guilt by freeing the slaves one owns. If one feels guilty for being a colonizer or occupier, then get rid of the guilt by no longer being a colonizer and occupier. To the degree that you feel guilty about being a colonist and occupier, but remain in this country, you come across as a preening pretentious blowhard, not someone to take seriously. If you REALLY felt guilty about being a colonist and an occupier, you would stop being a colonist and an occupier, and LEAVE.
As the saying goes, either perform your bodily function or get off the pot.
BTW, part of my ancestry is Indian. Half of my parents' siblings married people with 1/8 Indian ancestry. Two of my seven cousins married people with Indian ancestry. My brother's wife has Indian ancestry. Some of my ancestors on the frontier were attacked by Indians. It's not that simple.
Hmmmm, so I guess Jews worldwide need to get off the "Holocaust"; "Never again" train, stop the self-pity party, stop the reflexive adoration/justification for Israel's misdeeds, eh?
Your casual, flippant remark shows that you totally lack any historical perspective in your 'analysis'. You seem to be totally ignorant of the fact that over 1,000,000 Serbs died at the hands of the Nazis and their oh so willing executioners, the Croat Ustasha and the Croatian and Muslim SS units.
Pick up an unbiased history book now and again!
I have read it many times. Read your history books...stronger cultures displace or assimilate the weak. Like it or not, that is the way of the world. If not the English, it would have been the Spanish or the French. What is your point?
What amazes me is this type of what - comment, philosophy, view - assumes the alternative to the current evil system of large stable countries is a wonderful borderless, bliss where everyone lives in harmony and where everyone loves one another world wide. You don't have to study history much to see that this would not be the case in borderless world. Look at the middle ages a time of very weak countries and powers. People lived in serfdom and in constant threat of being overrun by the next wave of marauders. No freedom, no way to reach for higher goals for oneself or for one's children and certainly no peace. Look at Africa a place of weak countries and blurred borders. Warlords rule and starve and kill those who disagree with them. I hate to break to Mr. Roschhild but human nature is weak and lends itself to take advantage - that is what is truly special about this country - the framers knew this and created a country - the first in history to deal with and check this weakness. Allowing one to better oneself and maybe as Mike Divx points out to attain a more perfected society. A society that can only be reached through the U.S. and models like her - not by tearing her down which takes us backward. That is what is so special about this country Mr. Rothschild. That is what we celebrate on the 4th of July. If you can't wake up and appreciate that and be glad for the patriotism that has purchased you peace, you have no business editing anything.
Patriotism has been the sole enabling principle for racists, nationalists, and for hate-mongering malevolents of every stripe, all through human history.
It cannot be intellectually justified -- it is itself something that is used to justify crimes against other human beings; and it is the only thing that has ever been used to justify such crimes.
So… assessed solely by the effects that it has had when used as a fundamental principle, patriotism must be adjudged to be the lowest form of intellectual rubbish.
As to the claim adduced by some that patriotism is a kind of “love,” that is simply a linguistic error: you are expected, you are required--by those in charge--to have this "love." That's like expecting, or requiring that you love broccoli or okra. It cannot be done. Love cannot be coerced. It is a linguistic error to give the name "love" to something whose very nature it is to be a command issuing from those with power over you.
Allow me to conclude on just one quote and just one link:
"Heroism on command, senseless violence, and all the loathsome nonsense that goes by the name of patriotism - how passionately I hate them!"
- Albert Einstein
http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id431.html
Personally, I'd say that any kind of rigid dogma, such as yours or Rothschild's, should be consigned to the dustbins of history. I'll leave it up to you and Rothschild to argue over which rigid dogma should be deemed "lowest".
Let me confine my remarks to the vague historian (perhaps some eager third-grader reading this may take on the vague logician).
Mr/Ms RS--do you mean that in the Soviet Union one was not imprisoned on suspicions of “lack of patriotism?” Do you mean that ordinary citizens there were not expected to spy on their neighbors and denounce them for this lack? Do you mean that the Soviet media did not make any efforts to instill flag-waving patriotism in its citizenry? Do you really mean to assert that the Soviet Union was that radically different from all those other hoodlum dictatorships of the 20th Century?
I hope that you may have a chance to check with your vague history sources, and that you will be kind enough to take the trouble to get back to us on this. In the meantime, while you’re checking, here’s a quote from another recent essay (William Blum) on the joys of patriotism.
“The Japanese pilots who bombed Pearl Harbor were being patriotic. The German people who supported Hitler and his conquests were being patriotic, fighting for the Fatherland. All the Latin American military dictators who overthrew democratically-elected governments and routinely tortured people were being patriotic -- saving their beloved country from ‘communism.’
General Augusto Pinochet of Chile: ‘I would like to be remembered as a man who served his country.’[1]
P.W. Botha, former president of apartheid South Africa: ‘I am not going to repent. I am not going to ask for favours. What I did, I did for my country.’ [2]
Pol Pot, mass murderer of Cambodia: ‘I want you to know that everything I did, I did for my country.’ [3]
Tony Blair, former British prime minister, defending his role in the murder of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis: “I did what I thought was right for our country.’ [4]”
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article...
Yes, we are a great country but we have a long, long way to go. As you accurately state we are well down on the list of benchmarks regarding the health and welfare of our citizens. And, I would guess that most Americans are not aware of this.
We as a country are more talk than action. Although the action we have taken over the past few years have put us and the rest of the world in jeopardy...in harms way. If we, and this administration in specific, focused more on the welfare of our fellow citizens and less on nation-building and expanding the US empire we could be considered the greatest nation. We are far from that now.
Thanks for sparking such a necessary debate in this country.
So, for the spirit of your ancestors globally, and for the struggle of all people who demand that what was said and what was meant line up don't entertain stopping, America just wouldn't be the same without your voice, for this is your gifting, and enlightenment is on your mantel -- you were born to do this! I can't wait for your next thought.
Courage,
Shea McLeod
Markham, ON
We're Oh So... (a poem)
Russ Vaughn
We’re hip, we’re cool and oh so arty;
We’re Democrats, the smarter party.
We’re sophisticated unlike you;
We understand merci beaucoup.
We’re urbane while you’re provincial;
We’re worldly-wise, so existential.
We’re cultured, complex, so refined;
We’ve left you ignorant serfs behind.
We’re witty authors of clever puns,
While you clods cling to God and guns.
Were you not so closed and clannish,
We’d have you peons speaking Spanish.
We say all this with knowing smirks;
We’re Democrats, you red-state jerks.
I read your "Why I am not patriotic" article in my local newspaper here in Georgia. It is one of the most disgusting and vile pieces of leftist tripe that I've ever read. No, we're not born with patriotism. We're not born with anything. Neither were you born hating your own country. That too, is a learned behavior.
For arguments sake, could it be possible that your professors in journalism school, who are the leftover hippies from the 60s, were wrong when they taught you how evil and oppressive your country is? How they made the insane comparison of this great nation to that of the Pol Pots, the Hitlers and the Mussolinis? How when this great country fought and defeated these evil despots to save the literal asses of the Europeans that we really were the oppressors and that these good men were just trying to liberate the people from the oppressiveness of democracy? While you do give a little credence to nationalism when "harnessing the group" your implied comparisons of our country and national pride to these regimes are not just wrong, but moronic. I'll remind you that you are blessed to be living in this great country of ours that has those F-16s, F18s and F22s fouling natures skies so that you can write your idiotic nonsense and not be beheaded or imprisoned for doing so.
Mr. Rothschild, your inability to understand the greatness of this country is profound. Your views, while widely fostered and accepted in leftist liberal circles are gibberish and nonsense to the majority in this country. Your claim about our rights and liberties being systematically assaulted is pure nonsense for none of my liberties nor my rights have been denied to me or you for that matter. You cannot point to or cite one systemic abuse of anyones rights. You cannot point to anywhere in the history of this great country that we have used our military might for empirical gain. You cannot cite one instance where this country has oppressed, beheaded, burned or raped a people or pillaged any country on the face of this earth because of political or religious differences. I'll remind you as to what I can point to as direct evidence of a "enemy within" this country such as yourself and your comrades in arms. I can point to the fact that the ilk in your movement:
1. Stands on the floor of the congress and makes the same insane comparisons to Pol Pot etal... as you do.
2. Rushes to defend the so-called rights of the poor oppressed terrorist scum of the earth that would slit the throats of your family, even your dog if you have one, ear to ear and deep, before your very eyes, then do the same to you.
3. Tells the world that America has lost the war, the surge will not work, isn't working.
4. Tells the world that the Marines in Haditha killed those civilians in cold blood. What happen to the presumption of innocence that you leftist fight so hard for, for child rapist, murderers and the criminal element in this country? Oh, I forgot, this is the military. You hate them too.
5. Purposely lies to the American People that this war is illegal, get your facts straight Mr. Rothschild, it is not illegal. The lawfulness of this war is evidenced by the 1991 cease-fire agreement with Iraq, the 16 UN Resolutions (your favorite organization I'm sure) passed over the preceding 12 years before the war, the 17th unanimous Security Counsel Resolution 1441, the "Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of the United States Armed Forces Against Iraq" passed by the 108th Congress, of which your democrat leaders voted for because they didn't want to be seen as being weak on National Security.
6. The WMDs of which 500 tons of yellow cake uranium found in Iraq at the beginning of the war and was just recently moved HERE, Mr. Rothschild. No WMDs uh?
7. Leaks National Security secrets that aids and abets our enemies in a time of war.
8. Pays homage to Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro.
9. Invites the despot leader of Iran to a major American university to speak and participate in a freedom that he denies his own people.
10. Jettisons the responsibility under the 1st Amendment of our Constitution to side with a political party to sway, manipulate, lie and undermine this country in a time of war.
11. Uses your 1st Amendment right to foster forged National Guard documents to manipulate the outcome of a Presidential election. I could go on and on and on citing examples of how your fellow travelers in the democrat party hate this nation, hates what it stands for and is working overtime to convince those of us that believe in the greatness of our country of just how evil and tyrannical we are as a nation. It's not working Mr. Rothschild.
Here are some vast differences between me as a conservative and you as a fascist liberal. If you've made it this far then perhaps you have the courage to read the rest.
It wasn't a conservative who is vested in the defeat of their own country at a time of war.
It wasn't a conservative who voted to send our troops into battle only to betray them.
It wasn't a conservative who said,"This war is lost".
It wasn't a conservative who said, "The surge is a failure".
It wasn't a conservative who publicly tried, convicted and sentenced our brave men in the Marines of the "Haditha murders".
It wasn't a conservative who on more than one occasion, leaked national security secrets to the New York Times.
It wasn't a conservative who says that they support our troops but withholds funding and support.
It wasn't a conservative who said that "if the surge works, well then, that is going to be a problem for us".
It wasn't a conservative who said, "We just killed the Patriot Act", with a smile on his face by the way.
It wasn't a conservative who wants to give terrorist scum Constitutional rights and make them an unsigned signatory to the Geneva Convention.
It wasn't a conservative who called General Petraeus a liar and a betrayer.
It wasn't a conservative who said the President is "unstable".
It wasn't a conservative who puts the welfare of terrorist over that of their fellow countrymen.
It wasn't a conservative who said the President is a liar and a loser to high school children.
It wasn't a conservative that stood on the senate floor as the majority leader and used the power of his office in an attempt to deprive Rush Limbaugh of his first amendment rights as a private citizen.
It wasn't a conservative who wants to give birth control to eleven year olds.
It wasn't a conservative who gave a habitual child rapist probation.
It wasn't a conservative who wants to give illegal aliens amnesty and drivers licenses.
It wasn't a conservative who won't let US drill for our own oil and keeps US dependent on foreign energy sources.
It wasn't a conservative who wants to legalize gay marriage.
It wasn't a conservative who wants to abort unborn children.
It wasn't a conservative who wants to abolish christianity from the public square.
It wasn't a conservative who wants to sit down and sing kumbaya with the enemies of the USA.
It wasn't a conservative who wants to raise our taxes.
It wasn't a conservative that buys, hook, line and sinker into the latest scam by the left, Global Warming.
It wasn't a conservative who wants to bring back the Fairness Doctrine.
It wasn't a conservative who said that "for the first time in history fire melts steel".
It wasn't a conservative who thinks that the Supreme Court is not liberal enough.
It wasn't a conservative who opposes voter ID cards.
It wasn't a conservative who went over to Syria to have a pow wow with Bassar Asyad.
It wasn't a conservative who threw a pie at Ann Coulter.
It wasn't a conservative who wouldn't let Jim Gilchrist speak at Columbia University but were all to happy to have Iran's AMADJIHAD speak.
It wasn't a conservative who would not let David Horowitz speak at Georgia Tech.
It wasn't a conservative who went overseas and bashed their own country in front of the whole world.
It wasn't a conservative who went down to Venezuela to bow at the feet of Hugo Chavez.
It wasn't a conservative who sat on a Vietcong anti-aircraft gun in support of the North Vietnamese.
It wasn't a conservative who puts out anti-American propagandist films.
It wasn't a conservative who said, "don't fear the terrorist, they are mothers and fathers too".
It wasn't a conservative who wants to take away our guns.
It wasn't a conservative who wants to nationalize healthcare.
It wasn't a conservative who........
Can you refute any of this? You may think so but in reality which is where I live, you cannot. All of the aforementioned is documented. Lie to yourself if you like.
I'll leave you with this quote from Cicero in 42 B.C. Mr. Rothschild,
"A nation can survive it's fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.
For the traitor appears not as a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear".
------Marcus Tullius Cicero
Roman orator, statesman 42 B.C.
He was speaking about you Mr. Rothschild.
Capt. David B. Caudle
I shudder to think how far we have fallen because of "Pride" and blind flag waving and acceptance of what comes out of the mouths of fear mongering Constitution destroyers like Dubya. Our blind "patriotism" and our thinking we are the best nation on earth is going to be the death of us. How can we even pretend to be a "moral beacon" when we torture prisoners and break our own laws? Yet if one of our own is tortured we would cry foul. I guess the right wingers have also forgotten the "Golden Rule". I can't help but think that with the latest goings on to destroy the Constitution that our Founding Fathers must be thinking "WTF??!!"
So thank you Matt, for saying what so many of us think and feel.
It's interesting that in the land of the so-called free, the folks who criticize you the most are the same ones who want to FORCE us into being patriotic, whatever that means. Actually, I know what patriotism means to many of them: Don't question authority, American lives are more valuable than the lives of non-Americans, and America is always right (even when we know what we're doing is wrong).
Oscar Wilde
All the commenters above who keep talking about how life in the US is better than in (put in third-world hell-hole of your choice) miss the point badly. We should all be grateful that the US has better institutions and as a result more wealth than most other countries, and we should all try hard to retain and improve these institutions. But to go from there to some emotional and unconditional "love" of the US is just pure irrationality.
Imagine you are handed the greatest car in the world - should you "love" it, or should you just be happy that you have a great car and work on its upkeep?
People as they are
Societies as they are
Light as it is
Patriotism distorts
People as they are
Societies as they are
Light as it is
Thanks Matthew!
You can celebrate the ideals of our founders (whether or not they still exist in practice) and the positive things the people of our nation have accomplished, and still be able to call a spade a spade and say that our nation has done and is still doing bad things at home and abroad and vocally oppose such things. Sadly, patriotism has become a celebration of government and military power (and religion!), instead of a celebration of the spirit of the people which still believes in freedom, equality, and justice. Apparently, it is the mission of those in power to crush that spirit and replace it with unquestioned loyalty. Thankfully dissent is allowed...at least for now.
The way that I know that you teach public school is that you hate the United States. No, you are not a patriot.
Is it too far fetched to believe that the authorities of any nation/organization may sometimes have their own agenda? One that does not directly represent or respect the will of their own people at large?
Could our national pursuit for worldwide democratic freedom be a simple front, under certain administrations?
Don't get me wrong, we as Americans are extremely fortunate. We do have the ability and freedom to criticize ourselves as a nation, and i think that is an absolute necessity. Without self criticism, there would be no improvement, nor any progression.
I am actually stunned, but not surprised, by your rant against not only patriotism, but also our country. Having served and retired from the military after serving almost 21 years, I find your presumptions and uninformed bile about as detestable as they come. I actually have to laugh when a Liberal or Progressive such as yourself, defends him or herself when someone questions their patriotism or love of their country. Your opinions while upsetting on not unusual to your ilk. You and most like you, have a disdain for this country and it's history that reveals itself not only in word, but in deed. Look at your current candidate for President.
It amazes me that people such as yourself, have no appreciation for the fact that you can write a retarded article like this and not be dragged into the street and shot for treason. The only reason you have that protection is because much better men and women than you, defended this country and your right to speak your mind, no matter how many people you offend with your nonsense. The problem with your form of political correctness is that you use it to protect and tolerate only your form of offense, while condemning and being intolerant of anything you disagree with. I thought "progressives" were the tolerant ones.
One of the reasons this is a great country is because people are entitled to disagree with an idiot like Matthew Rothschild and his type of "American". I am sure he has never been anywhere where he felt unsafe or unprotected because other people, his so-called "Imperialists", were providing an umbrella of protection for his hateful behind. I would like to see Mr. Rothschild survive in a place where there was true danger and nobody around to provide the safety net he enjoys, but doesn't appreciate.
Progessives would condemn this form of diarrhea of the mouth, if only they disagreed with you. My father would stand at your side and agree with you as well, but like you, he's never had to defend anything other than his own decaf latte and his backwards stances which mirror your own. The real issue is do you speak for yourself, or the greater Progressive movement? I think you are symptomatic of the greater mind and the rest of the moon-bat, Kool-aid drinkers you write for. Your progressive audience applauds you, however, the "Patriots", pity you for your anger, your stupidity and your poor sheltered and protected life.
Hope you enjoyed your 4th of July!! God Bless America!!!
Phil
I must take issue with much of what you said in your comment.
You said, "It amazes me that people such as yourself, have no appreciation for the fact that you can write a retarded article like this and not be dragged into the street and shot for treason. The only reason you have that protection is because much better men and women than you, defended this country and your right to speak your mind, no matter how many people you offend with your nonsense."
Let's examine your premise. "...The only reason you have that protection is because much better men and women than you, defended this country and your right to speak your mind, no matter how many people you offend with your nonsense." The last time this argument could in any wise be used was during WWII. Do you truly, honestly believe that the North Koreans, the North Vietnamese, the Panamanians, the Iraqis, the Serbs, the Afghanis and the Iraqis again were somehow preparing to mount a (successful) assault on the U.S., overturn the government and threaten "the American Way of Life"? Are you mad? The single largest real danger to "The American Way of Life" emanates from Washington, D.C. More of our rights have been illegally seized and abolished through actions from various administrations in D.C. than could ever be seized by any foreign power. I quote to you the words of a true American hero, Abraham Lincoln who said, "At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years. At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide."
So, Phil, if you truly want to abide by the oath you took to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States", when are you and those like minded going to march on Washington and defend our Constitution (which the present resident of the White House has deemed "just a damned piece of paper")?
I have at times questioned your credentials to be the editor of a magazine titled "The Progressive" and today as I read this I must say that you have redeemed yourself in my eyes. Patriotism always verges on jingoism, so much so that the difference is barely perceptible. This is readily witnessed by the many jingoistic responses you have received to your article. The replies are from people who are probably limousine liberals who either subscribe to The Progressive as dilettantes (if they subscribe at all) or who have never gone hungry in a well-fed country.
I agree with your appraisal and champion you as a Progressive.
Dick Hudson in Illinois (and by the way, in response to one of your detractors, I'm a veteran of the Korean War)
listen to such a diatribe. You've got to start with the basic good--try freedoms and opportunity--then work on the problems.
Dare I say, "enjoy the holiday?" cfoss/by the way, a Vietnam vet